Workshop Pembelajaran Geometri Berbasis Bukti melalui Pemanfaatan DGS Mathigon
Abstract
This workshop aims to improve the competence of teachers and prospective teachers in designing and using DGS Mathigon technology-based learning media to teach geometric proofs and provide a deeper understanding of the importance of introducing geometric proofs in the classroom. Participants consisted of teachers and prospective mathematics teachers who were introduced to the basic concepts of proof and how Mathigon can be used to visualize geometric concepts and clarify the proof process. The workshop implementation method was carried out through conceptual sessions, practice, and evaluation of the results of the participants' work. The results of the analysis of the participants' assignments showed the participants' abilities in designing geometric proof problems and using technology-based teaching media, namely Mathigon. A self-evaluation questionnaire showed that 85% of participants felt the material presented was very useful and relevant, and 75% felt more prepared to integrate Mathigon in their teaching. Overall, this workshop successfully introduced technology that can enrich geometry teaching, making learning more interactive and interesting for students.
References
Alkhateeb, M. A. (2019). The effect of using GeoGebra on students’ achievement in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(3), em1679. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108436
Arbain, N., & Shukor, N. A. (2015). The effects of GeoGebra on students achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.356
Galili, R., Hartono, Y., & Hiltiramartin, C. (2023). Desain Pembelajaran Identitas Trigonometri Dengan Proof Based Learning di SMA. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2287–2298. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2677
Hartono, Y., Kurniadi, E., & Pratiwi, W. D. (2023). Mathematics teachers’ perception on mathematical proof. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2811(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142291
Herizal, Suhendra, & Nurlaelah, E. (2020). Pengaruh Kemampuan Memahami Bukti Matematis terhadap Kemampuan Mengonstruksi Bukti Matematis pada Topik Trigonometri. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 17-24.
Hidayat, W., & Sumarmo, U. (2016). Mathematical proof ability and learning independence of mathematics education students through problem-based learning. Infinity Journal, 5(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v5i1.p63-72
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning. Computers & Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2017). Research on mathematical reasoning ability in geometry learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.11.2.3456.123-134
Maarif, S., Perbowo, K., Noto, M. S., & Harisman, Y. (2019). Obstacles in constructing geometrical proofs of mathematics-teacher-students based on Boero’s proving model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315, 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012043
Muslim, N. E. I., Zakaria, M. I., & Fang, C. Y. (2023). A systematic review of GeoGebra in mathematics education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(3). 1192-1203. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i3/19133
Rahmadi, I. F. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): Kerangka Pengetahuan Guru Abad 21. Jurnal of Civic and Education Studies, 6(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7308-0_5
Sari, Y. M., Kartowagiran, B., Retnawati, H., & Fiangga, S. (2019). The characteristics of mathematical reasoning and proof test on Indonesian high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1200, 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1200/1/012007
Sari, R. H. N., & Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical reasoning: Students’ difficulties in geometry proof. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943, 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012058
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Segal, R., Oxman, V., & Stupel, M. (2021). Using dynamic geometry software to enhance specialized content knowledge: Pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11065
Septiati, E., Hartono, Y., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2023). Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Bukti Materi Ketaksamaan Segitiga Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v6i1.13626
Sinclair, N., & Robutti, O. (2013). Technology and the role of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-013-9202-7
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2017). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat by http://ojs.stkippgri-lubuklinggau.ac.id/index.php/JPM is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
